Sam Raimi’s original trilogy was a box office juggernaut, and Sony made plenty of money off its follow-ups in the two Amazing Spider-Man films - though those continuities were abandoned when the studio cut bait and cast Tom Holland to join the wider world of Marvel heroes.īut that Amazing Spider-Man series? It wasn’t all bad. That changed when Spider-Man: No Way Home offered Garfield's Spider-Man an opportunity to catch a falling MJ (Zendaya) and save her from imminent doom.Long before there was a Marvel Cinematic Universe and endless comic book adaptations on the box office and small screen, there was Spider-Man. In that film, the character would have been dealing with the fallout of losing Emma Stone's Gwen Stacy, an emotional sequence from the second Amazing film which never had a chance to get resolved. After The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Sony had plans for Garfield's version of the character to take on a Sinister Six. Spoilers for Spider-Man: No Way Home follow. Tom Holland wants to see The Amazing Spider-Man 3 with Andrew Garfield as much as the rest of us! /63Alc7Bx1D- Phase Zero – MCU February 3, 2022 This is when Marvel Studios and Sony Pictures decided to collaborate for a fresh start with Spider-Man, casting Holland as a rebooted version of the character who would debut in Marvel's Captain America: Civil War before going on to have a trilogy of Spider-Man movies and playing a role in a pair of Avengers movies.
"I think what was so wonderful was how Andrew was able to kind of make amends with the character and the studio, you know, to kind of win the general public back." Garfield's run as Spider-Man was cut short following The Amazing Spider-Man 2 in 2014 as the film saw the Spider-Man franchise's box office numbers trending in the wrong direction. "I would love to see The Amazing Spider-Man 3," Holland told in an exclusive interview at a press event for Uncharted.
0 kommentar(er)
